Question? Are the different Schambach lines in America closely related?
Answer! Yes, some of them are. Through DNA tests using the Y chromosome, we are now able to determine approximatly how long ago two Schambach men share a common male ancestor and narrow down the number of generations back to that ancestor. The results so far suggest that Adolph of 1729 and George of 1749 are not closely related, at least not through the direct male line. However, later Schambach arrivals have matched George of 1749 which is exciting and allowed us to connect certain families back to Germany.
We currently have 17 participants in 8 groups shown below. If you would like to participate in this project, more information can be found at www.familytreedna.com or you can contact me at . Any other Shambaugh, Schambach, etc. is more than welcome to participate. Some of the more recent family lines to immigrate may be able to connect to either Adolph or George or to each other. If they do, then we can direct our search in Europe to particular areas.
|
|
DYS#s (D=DNA, Y=Chromosome, S=Segment) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kit |
Haplogroup and Family Line |
D Y S 3 9 3 |
D Y S 3 9 0 |
D Y S 1 9 |
D Y S 3 9 1 |
D Y S 3 8 5 |
D |
D Y S 3 8 8 |
D Y S 4 3 9 |
D Y S 3 8 9 i |
D Y S 3 9 2 |
D Y S 3 8 9 ii |
D Y S 4 5 8 |
D Y S 4 5 9 |
D Y S 4 5 5 |
D Y S 4 5 4 |
D |
D Y S 4 3 7 |
D Y S 4 4 8 |
D Y S 4 4 9 |
D Y S 4 6 4 |
D Y S 4 6 0 |
Y G A T A H 4 |
Y C A I I |
D Y S 4 5 6 |
D Y S 6 0 7 |
D Y S 5 7 6 |
D Y S 5 7 0 |
C D Y |
D Y S 4 4 2 |
D Y S 4 3 8 |
D Y S 5 3 1 |
D Y S 5 7 8 |
D Y F 3 9 5 S 1 |
D Y S 5 9 0 |
D Y S 5 3 7 |
D Y S 6 4 1 |
D Y S 4 7 2 |
D Y F 4 0 6 S 1 |
D Y S 5 1 1 |
D Y S 4 2 5 |
D Y S 4 1 3 |
D Y S 5 5 7 |
D Y S 5 9 4 |
D Y S 4 3 6 |
D Y S 4 9 0 |
D Y S 5 3 4 |
D Y S 4 5 0 |
D Y S 4 4 4 |
D Y S 4 8 1 |
D Y S 5 2 0 |
D Y S 4 4 6 |
D Y S 6 1 7 |
D Y S 5 6 8 |
D Y S 4 8 7 |
D Y S 5 7 2 |
D Y S 6 4 0 |
D Y S 4 9 2 |
D Y S 5 6 5 |
D Y S 7 1 0 |
D Y S 4 8 5 |
D Y S 6 3 2 |
D Y S 4 9 5 |
D Y S 5 4 0 |
D Y S 7 1 4 |
D Y S 7 1 6 |
D Y S 7 1 7 |
D Y S 5 0 5 |
D Y S 5 5 6 |
D Y S 5 4 9 |
D Y S 5 8 9 |
D Y S 5 2 2 |
D Y S 4 9 4 |
D Y S 5 3 3 |
D Y S 6 3 6 |
D Y S 5 7 5 |
D Y S 6 3 8 |
D Y S 4 6 2 |
D Y S 4 5 2 |
D Y S 4 4 5 |
Y G A T A A 1 0 |
D Y S 4 6 3 |
D Y S 4 4 1 |
Y G G A A T 1 B 0 7 |
D Y S 5 2 5 |
D Y S 7 1 2 |
D Y S 5 9 3 |
D Y S 6 5 0 |
D Y S 5 3 2 |
D Y S 7 1 5 |
D Y S 5 0 4 |
D Y S 5 1 3 |
D Y S 5 6 1 |
D Y S 5 5 2 |
D Y S 7 2 6 |
D Y S 6 3 5 |
D Y S 5 8 7 |
D Y S 6 4 3 |
D Y S 4 9 7 |
D Y S 5 1 0 |
D Y S 4 3 4 |
D Y S 4 6 1 |
D Y S 4 3 5 |
GROUP 1 |
EV13 |
These six participants are from the line of Adolph Schambach who immigrated in 1729. Four were known to descend from his son George. The other two also descend from his son George but their ancestry was previously unknown. The DNA results helped narrow down the possiblities. Of the six participants, there is one marker (464c) on two individuals that is different by one number and a different marker (458) on another individual whose ancestry was previously unknown. A difference of one number on one marker is an acceptable mutation over 280 years, especially when two of the individuals have had 111 markers tested. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
54613 | gr-gr-grandson of 1790_John_Shambaugh, 1755_George_Shambach_Jr., 1715_Johann_Georg_Schambach, 1690_Adolph_Schambach Originally unknown ancestry but traced once DNA tests were returned. |
13 | 23 | 13 | 10 | 16_20 | 11 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 11 | 28 | 16 | 9_9 | 11 | 11 | 25 | 14 | 20 | 31 | 14_16_17_17 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
25712 | gr-gr-grandson of 1779_George_Shambaugh, 1756_Ludwig_Shambach, 1715_Johann_Georg_Schambach, 1690_Adolph_Schambach |
13 | 23 | 13 | 10 | 16_20 | 11 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 11 | 28 | 15 | 9_9 | 11 | 11 | 25 | 14 | 20 | 31 | 14_16_17_17 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
28896 | gr-gr-gr-gr-grandson of 1783_John_Philip_Shambaugh, 1750_Philip_Shambach, 1715_Johann_Georg_Schambach, 1690_Adolph_Schambach |
13 | 23 | 13 | 10 | 16_20 | 11 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 11 | 28 | 15 | 9_9 | 11 | 11 | 25 | 14 | 20 | 31 | 14_16_17_17 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
364691 |
gr-gr-gr-grandson of Originally suspected ancestry but confirmed once DNA tests were returned. |
13 | 23 | 13 | 10 | 16_20 | 11 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 11 | 28 | 15 | 9_9 | 11 | 11 | 25 | 14 | 20 | 31 | 14_16_17_17 | 9 | 11 | 19_21 | 16 | 12 | 18 | 18 | 31_34 | 11 | 10 | 10 | 8 | 15_15 | 8 | 11 | 10 | 8 | 12 | 10 | 0 | 22_24 | 19 | 11 | 12 | 12 | 16 | 7 | 12 | 22 | 18 | 13 | 13 | 12 | 14 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 36 | 15 | 8 | 15 | 11 | 23 | 27 | 19 | 13 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 12 | 9 | 12 | 11 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 31 | 10 | 12 | 18 | 14 | 11 | 11 | 19 | 16 | 21 | 12 | 23 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 22 | 14 | 21 | 18 | 12 | 14 | 17 | 9 | 12 | 11 |
40903 | gr-gr-gr-grandson of 1790_John_Shambaugh, 1755_George_Shambach,_Jr., 1715_Johann_Georg_Schambach, 1690_Adolph_Schambach |
13 | 23 | 13 | 10 | 16_20 | 11 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 11 | 28 | 15 | 9_9 | 11 | 11 | 25 | 14 | 20 | 31 | 14_16_16_17 | 9 | 11 | 19_21 | 16 | 12 | 18 | 18 | 31_34 | 11 | 10 | 10 | 8 | 15_15 | 8 | 11 | 10 | 8 | 12 | 10 | 0 | 22_24 | 19 | 11 | 12 | 12 | 16 | 7 | 12 | 22 | 18 | 13 | 13 | 12 | 14 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 36 | 15 | 8 | 15 | 11 | 23 | 27 | 19 | 13 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 12 | 9 | 12 | 11 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 31 | 10 | 12 | 18 | 14 | 11 | 11 | 19 | 16 | 21 | 12 | 23 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 22 | 14 | 21 | 18 | 12 | 14 | 17 | 9 | 12 | 11 |
44742 | gr-gr-grandson of 1793_John_George_Shambaugh, 1755_George_Shambach,_Jr., 1715_Johann_Georg_Schambach, 1690_Adolph_Schambach |
13 | 23 | 13 | 10 | 16_20 | 11 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 11 | 28 | 15 | 9_9 | 11 | 11 | 25 | 14 | 20 | 31 | 14_16_16_17 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GROUP |
R-M269, R-CTS6889 |
Of the six participants, three are descendants of the two lines of George Schambach who immigrated in 1749. Their results match exactly, re-enforcing our prior research on George's sons. Another participant is a descendant of a Jakob Schambach whose children immigrated in the 1880s and 1890s. His results match the descendants of George on all but two markers (447) and (534) out of 67 markers. This says that they are closely related. Since we have more information on Jacob's ancestry in Germany, this led us to where to look for more information on the family of George. Results for a fifth participant whose name in America was originally Shambeck but later changed to Shamek also places him in this family. His results match the descendants of George on almost all markers. The sixth participant is a distant relative of the other four whose family remained in Germany. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
46046 | gr-grandson of 1828_Michael_Shambaugh, 1798_Johann_Philip_Shambaugh, 1762_George_Schambach_II, 1720_Johann_Georg_Schambach, 1685_Johann_Heinrich_Schambach, 1648_Jakob_Schambach, 1615_Johann_Schambach, 1596_Jaeckel_Schambach, 1575_Hermann_Schambach |
13 | 24 | 14 | 10 | 11_14 | 13 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 13 | 28 | 18 | 9_9 | 11 | 11 | 25 | 15 | 19 | 30 | 17_17_17_17 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
25711 | gr-grandson of 1837_Johannes_Ira_Shambaugh, 1802_George_Shambach, 1764_Johann_Philip_Schambach, 1720_Johann_Georg_Schambach, 1685_Johann_Heinrich_Schambach, 1648_Jakob_Schambach, 1615_Johann_Schambach, 1596_Jaeckel_Schambach, 1575_Hermann_Schambach |
13 | 24 | 14 | 10 | 11_14 | 13 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 13 | 28 | 18 | 9_9 | 11 | 11 | 25 | 15 | 19 | 30 | 17_17_17_17 | 11 | 12 | 19_23 | 17 | 15 | 17 | 18 | 36_42 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 9 | 15_16 | 8 | 10 | 10 | 8 | 10 | 10 | 12 | 23_23 | 17 | 10 | 12 | 12 | 14 | 8 | 12 | 22 | 20 | 14 | 12 | 11 | 13 | 11 | 11 | 12 | 13 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1006615 | gr-gr-grandson of 1839_John_Paul_Shambaugh, 1816_Peter_Shambaugh_II, 1784_Peter_Shambach, 1764_Johann_Philip_Schambach, 1720_Johann_Georg_Schambach, 1685_Johann_Heinrich_Schambach, 1648_Jakob_Schambach, 1615_Johann_Schambach, 1596_Jaeckel_Schambach, 1575_Hermann_Schambach |
13 | 24 | 14 | 10 | 11_14 | 13 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 13 | 28 | 18 | 9_9 | 11 | 11 | 25 | 15 | 19 | 30 | 17_17_17_17 | 11 | 12 | 19_23 | 17 | 15 | 17 | 18 | 36_41 | 12 | 12 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
71478 | gr-grandson of 1843_Jakob_Schambach, 1801_Tobias_Schambach, 1759_Johann_Heinrich_Schambach, 1720_Johannes_Schambach, 1681_Johann_Petrus_Schambach, 1653_Johannes_Hermann_Schambach, 1615_Johann_Schambach, 1596_Jaeckel_Schambach, 1575_Hermann_Schambach |
13 | 24 | 14 | 10 | 11_14 | 13 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 13 | 28 | 18 | 9_9 | 11 | 11 | 26 | 15 | 19 | 30 | 17_17_17_17 | 11 | 12 | 19_23 | 17 | 15 | 17 | 18 | 36_42 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 9 | 15_16 | 8 | 10 | 10 | 8 | 10 | 10 | 12 | 23_23 | 17 | 10 | 12 | 12 | 15 | 8 | 12 | 22 | 20 | 14 | 12 | 11 | 13 | 11 | 11 | 12 | 13 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
123934 | grandson of 1869_Edward_Henry_Shamek, 1835_Franz_Jakob_Schambach, 1798_Johann_Theobald_Schambach, 1761_Johannes_Schambach, 1720_Johannes_Schambach, 1681_Johann_Petrus_Schambach, 1653_Johannes_Hermann_Schambach, 1615_Johann_Schambach, 1596_Jaeckel_Schambach, 1575_Hermann_Schambach |
13 | 24 | 14 | 11 | 11_14 | 13 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 13 | 28 | 18 | 9_9 | 11 | 11 | 25 | 15 | 19 | 30 | 17_17_17_17 | 11 | 12 | 19_23 | 17 | 15 | 17 | 18 | 36_41 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 9 | 15_16 | 8 | 10 | 10 | 8 | 10 | 10 | 12 | 23_23 | 17 | 10 | 12 | 12 | 15 | 8 | 12 | 22 | 20 | 14 | 12 | 11 | 13 | 11 | 11 | 12 | 13 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
N198324 |
great-grandson of |
13 | 24 | 14 | 10 | 11_14 | 13 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 13 | 28 | 18 | 9_9 | 11 | 11 | 25 | 15 | 19 | 30 | 17_17_17_17 | 11 | 12 | 19_23 | 18 | 15 | 17 | 19 | 36_41 | 12 | 12 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GROUP |
R-M269 |
This participant was also believed to be a descendant of George Schambach who immigrated in 1749 but his ancestry was un-proven. The DNA test has shown however, that his direct mail line is not closely connected to this Schambach. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
211470 | thought to be gr-grandson of 1817_John_Shambaugh, 1798_Johann_Philip_Shambaugh, 1762_George_Schambach_II, 1720_Johann_Georg_Schambach |
13 | 23 | 14 | 11 | 11_14 | 12 | 13 |
14 |
13 |
13 | 28 | 18 | 9_10 | 11 | 11 | 26 | 15 | 19 | 29 | 15_15_16_17 | 10 | 11 | 19_23 | 15 | 15 | 19 | 18 | 36_38 | 12 | 12 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GROUP |
R-M512 |
This participant is a descendant of Frederick Schambach who immigrated in the 1860s to the Baltimore, MD area. His DNA has shown that it is not closely connected to any of the other Schambach lines. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
212615 | gr-grandson of 1861_Henry_E._Schambach, 1834_Frederick_Schambach |
13 | 25 | 16 | 10 | 11_14 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 14 | 11 | 30 | 16 | 9_10 | 11 | 11 | 23 | 14 | 19 | 32 | 12_12_14_14_15_16 | 11 | 11 | 19_23 | 17 | 16 | 18 | 19 | 34_39 | 14 | 11 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GROUP |
R-M198 |
This participant is a descendant of Carl Heinrich Schambach who immigrated in 1849 to the Indiana Co., PA area. His DNA has shown that it is not closely connected to any of the other Schambach lines. Even though it is somewhat close to that of group 4, the difference is enough that the connection would be further back before when last names were commonly used. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
293088 | gr-gr-grandson of 1850_William Schambach, 1814_Carl Heinrich Schambach, 1761_Johann Casper Schambach, 1734_Georg Wilhlem Schambach, 1710_Christoph Schambach |
13 | 25 | 16 | 10 | 11_14 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 13 | 11 | 29 | 18 | 9_9 | 11 | 11 | 23 | 14 | 20 | 32 | 12_12_13_15_15_15_15_16 | 12 | 11 | 19_23 | 18 | 16 | 19 | 19 | 35_35 | 13 | 11 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GROUP |
J-M172 |
This participant is a descendant of Henry A Schambach who lived in the Snyder Co., PA area. His DNA has shown that it is closely connected to the Mertz family but with the last name of Schambach, his mother may have been a Schambach. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
311169 | grandson of 1857_Henry A. Schambach |
12 | 24 | 17 | 10 | 13_15 | 11 | 15 | 13 | 12 | 11 | 28 | 17 | 8_9 | 11 | 11 | 28 | 16 | 19 | 29 | 13_13_16_18 | 11 | 10 | 19_20 | 13 | 14 | 16 | 18 | 36_39 | 11 | 9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GROUP |
R-M269 |
This participant is a descendant of Elijah Shambaugh who lived in the Morgan Co., WV area. His DNA has shown that it is closely connected to the Smoot family but with the last name of Shambaugh, his mother was probably a Shambaugh, maybe a daughter of Ludwig 'Lewis' Shambach. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
695150 | gr-grandson of 1854_Samuel Albert Shambaugh, 1820_Elijah Shambaugh |
13 | 24 | 15 | 11 | 11_15 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 14 | 13 | 30 | 18 | 9_10 | 11 | 11 | 24 | 15 | 19 | 27 | 12_15_17_17 | 10 | 10 | 19_23 | 15 | 15 | 20 | 17 | 34_40 | 12 | 12 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GROUP |
R-M269 |
This participant is that of a Shambo family with Canadian connections. Even though it may appear that it closely matches Group 2, there are at least 3 differences in the first 12 markers meaning that there is only a 17.4% chance that the common male ancester would be within the last 24 generations or at least 600 years. It's possible there is a closer connection but it's more likely the connection goes back 1000s of years. This person has however matched another person who has tested their DNA with the last name of Archambault, matching 36 of 37 markers. This is not that surprising as many of the Canadian Archambault families changed their name to Shambo once they moved to the United States. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
89782 | Canadian Shambo descendant | 13 | 24 | 14 | 11 | 11_14 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 29 | 16 | 9_10 | 11 | 11 | 25 | 15 | 19 | 29 | 15_16_16_17 | 11 | 12 | 19_23 | 18 | 15 | 17 | 17 | 33_39 | 12 | 11 |